Offshore Wind Getting Crushed by Carbon Seize

Visitor table-turning by David Middleton

I really wrote the title to this thread earlier than I regarded up the details…

Offshore Wind Energy Is Crushing Carbon Seize Goals
Tina Casey
OCT 17, 2019

Fossil gas stakeholders are leaning on carbon seize to maintain coal and different fossil fuels related, however the know-how has but to show itself commercially. In the meantime, renewables are…

[blah, blah, blah]

Over 4 years later, the U.S. nonetheless has just one utility-scale carbon seize mission in operation, positioned on the Petra Nova coal energy plant in Texas.

[blah, blah, blah]

For some perspective on the alternatives for offshore wind development within the U.S., take into account that the nation’s first offshore wind farm, Block Island, started operations in 2016 within the waters of Rhode Island, with solely 5 generators and a mixed capability of 30 megawatts.

[blah, blah, blah]

Tina writes often for TriplePundit and different web sites, with a deal with army, authorities and company sustainability, clear tech analysis and rising power applied sciences. She is a former Deputy Director of Public Affairs of the New York Metropolis Division of Environmental Safety, and creator of books and articles on recycling and different conservation themes. She is at the moment Deputy Director of Public Info for the County of Union, New Jersey. Views expressed listed here are her personal and don’t essentially replicate company coverage.

Triple Pundit

Ms. Casey has a BA in philosophy, is a profession bureaucrat. and has held a number of half time jobs with enviro-nitwit web sites. Therefore, she’s an power knowledgeable.

No matter offshore wind energy might or might not do sooner or later, is irrelevant to the truth that it’s at the moment solely “crushing” the budgets of power shoppers.

Offshore Wind vs. Carbon Seize: Who’s Crushing Whom?

The US at the moment has one in every of every up and operating. The power math is decidedly one-sided.

Block Island Wind Farm

The Block Island Wind Farm generates a lot much less power than a mean single Marcellus gasoline effectively.

In it’s first 12 months of operation the Block Island Wind Farm managed a 39% capability issue.

 MWh100% OutputCapacity FactorDec-16               6,313                21,79929%Jan-17               eight,898                21,79941%Feb-17               7,801                19,69040%Mar-17            10,514                21,79948%Apr-17               6,904                21,09633%Could-17               9,162                21,79942%Jun-17               9,932                21,09647%Jul-17               6,724                21,79931%Aug-17               5,712                21,79926%Sep-17               5,698                21,09627%Oct-17            10,195                21,79947%Nov-17            10,985                21,09652%1-yr Complete            98,838              256,66839%

That’s a mean every day fee of 271 MWh/d… That’s 924 million British Thermal Models per day (mmBtu/d).

In mild of the journalistic malpractice of assuming that wind and fossil fuels are each interchangeable and mutually incompatible:

A typical Marcellus pure gasoline effectively produces 5,000 mmBtu/d.A typical deepwater oil effectively within the Gulf of Mexico produces 5,000 bbl/d, almost 30,000 mmBtu/d.The Block Island Wind Farm produces 924 mmBtu/d.

READ  Photo voltaic Energy Triumph: Los Angeles Publicizes The Finish of Fossil Gas

Whats that?  It’s unfair to instantly evaluate wellhead pure gasoline manufacturing to electrical energy output from an influence plant… OK…

Pure GasBtu/kWh                    7,870Properly ProductionBtu/d   5,000,000,000Electrical energy OuputkWh/d               635,324Electrical energy Ouput MWh/d                       635Electrical energy Output Block Islands price                         2.Three

A single typical Marcellus gasoline effectively yields 2.Three Block Islands price of electricity-equivalent power per day.

Petra Nova

Billion Greenback Petra Nova Coal Carbon Seize Mission a Monetary Success However Unclear If It Can Be Replicated

NRG Power and JX Nippon’s three way partnership Petra Nova mission, the world’s largest working post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) seize system, is about to obtain one other huge increase from ongoing bipartisan enthusiasm for “clear coal.” The U.S. price range invoice handed by Congress in early February included the FUTURE Act (S.1535) that extends tax credit for carbon seize, utilization, and storage (CCUS) tasks and raises the credit score from $10 to $35 per ton used for enhanced oil restoration. This definitely raises the prospects for additional funding in an costly and nascent know-how.

The Petra Nova system has been working since January 2017 on the retrofitted coal-fired Unit #eight at W.A. Parish Producing Station southwest of Houston, Texas. The 610 MW unit produces about 25% of the plant’s whole output and CO2 emissions. A portion of the emissions, equal to that of a 240 MW unit, are routed to the carbon seize system that cools the gasoline, binds the CO2 with a solvent, vents the remaining nitrogen gasoline, after which reheats the combination to interrupt the CO2 bonds. The CO2 is cooled and compressed to a supercritical liquid that then enters an 81-mile pipeline to the West Ranch Oil Discipline the place it’s pumped 5,000 toes underground into the Frio Formation and combines with the oil, decreasing its density. Extracted oil is processed by a CO2 separator that returns the gasoline again to the formation. An trade rule of thumb estimates an additional two barrels of oil is extracted for each ton of CO2 injected, which has thus far elevated manufacturing from 300 barrels to greater than Four,000 barrels per day and will attain as excessive as 15,000.

[…]

Scott Madden Administration Consultants

If carbon emissions really have been an existential risk, nearly as extreme because the financial risk of the Inexperienced New Deal Cultural Revolution, then we have to discover a strategy to economically seize and sequester the utmost quantity of carbon dioxide. And there is just one manner to do that. Seize carbon emissions from coal and pure gasoline fired energy crops and use it for enhanced restoration tasks in outdated oil fields.

OCTOBER 31, 2017
Petra Nova is one in every of two carbon seize and sequestration energy crops on the earth

READ  Utilizing Cosmic Rays to Predict Volcanic Eruptions?

The Petra Nova facility, a coal-fired energy plant positioned close to Houston, Texas, is one in every of solely two working energy crops with carbon seize and storage (CCS) on the earth, and it’s the solely such facility in america. The 110 megawatt (MW) Boundary Dam plant in Saskatchewan, Canada, close to the border with North Dakota, is the opposite electrical utility facility utilizing a CCS system.

[…]

Petra Nova’s post-combustion CO2 seize system started operations in January 2017. The 240-megawatt (MW) carbon seize system that was added to Unit eight (654 MW capability) of the prevailing W.A. Parish pulverized coal-fired producing plant receives about 37% of Unit eight’s emissions, that are diverted by a flue gasoline slipstream. Petra Nova’s carbon-capture system is designed to seize about 90% of the carbon dioxide ( CO2) emitted from the flue gasoline slipstream, or about 33% of the overall emissions from Unit eight. The post-combustion course of is power intensive and requires a devoted pure gasoline unit to accommodate the power necessities of the carbon-capture course of.

The carbon dioxide captured by Petra Nova’s system is then utilized in enhanced oil restoration at close by oil fields. Enhanced oil restoration includes injecting water, chemical compounds, or gases (resembling carbon dioxide) into oil reservoirs to extend the power of oil to circulate to a effectively.

By comparability, Kemper had been designed to seize about 65% of the plant’s CO2 utilizing a pre-combustion system. The capital prices related to the Kemper mission have been initially estimated at $2.Four billion, or about $Four,100 per kilowatt (kW), however value overruns led to development prices in extra of $7.5 billion (almost $13,000/kW). Petra Nova CCS retrofit prices have been reported to be $1 billion, or $Four,200/kW, and the mission was accomplished on price range and on time.

Principal contributor: Kenneth Dubin

US EIA

When the capital prices of the Kemper facility turned untenable, it was changed with pure gas-fired items. Had it been an offshore wind farm, it could have simply been extra closely backed.

PetraNova “has thus far elevated manufacturing from 300 barrels to greater than Four,000 barrels per day” within the West Ranch Oil Discipline “and will attain as excessive as 15,000” bbl/d. There’s a minimum of one different related mission within the pipeline.

A couple of 12 months Petra Nova it went into service, I downloaded a number of the Texas Railroad Fee manufacturing knowledge for one of many producing items within the West Ranch Oil Discipline.

Determine 1a. The initiation of CO2 injection in a short time boosted oil manufacturing within the WEST RANCH (41-A & 98-A CONS.) unit from about 100 BOPD to Three-Four,000 BOPD. The August-September interval was adversely affected by Hurricane Harvey.

READ  Why Roy Spencer’s Criticism is Incorrect

Determine 1b. Output is comparatively unchanged.  The best demand happens throughout Could by September when temperatures are highest.  Could-Sept 2016: Avg. Temp 82 °F, whole output  7,802,898 MWh.  Could-Sept 2017 Avg. Temp 80 °F, whole output  7,655,403 MWh.   Nameplate capability is about Four,000 MW and carbon seize solely impacts 240 MW; so this shouldn’t be a shock.

The U.S. Division of Power estimates that 85 billion barrels of oil might be recovered from outdated oil fields by CO2 EOR. Whereas, for many fields, CO2 EOR is uneconomic with oil costs beneath $85/bbl, if a drastic discount of CO2 was actually a matter of urgency, just a little little bit of taxpayer cash spent on subsidizing carbon seize storage and utilization (CCSU) would have a a lot higher impression on carbon emissions than the entire taxpayers’ cash p!$$ed away on wind and photo voltaic boondoggles.

Concerning the way forward for crushing…

IEEFA August 23, 2019

Japanese U.S. states have plans for 19.3GW of offshore wind capability

States alongside the U.S. East Coast are searching for to acquire greater than 19,300 MW of offshore wind capability by 2035, in response to an evaluation from S&P World Market Intelligence and S&P World Platts.

Laws, regulation and, now, permitted energy buy agreements are encouraging the event of the brand new capability, although solely 30 MW of offshore wind sources are working within the U.S. Grid operators might have to switch their procedures to accommodate the extra sources.

[…]

IEEFA

Assuming that the Petra Nova/West Ranch mission reaches its deliberate objective of 16,000 bbl/d of enhanced crude oil manufacturing and assuming all 19.Three GW of offshore wind capability are literally constructed and ship a 40% capability issue…

16,000 bbl/d = 92,800 mmBtu/d19.Three GW @40% = 632,202 mmBtu/d

If the entire legislatively deliberate tasks have been constructed delivered a 40% capability issue, the entire offshore wind energy within the US would yield 7 instances the power as the one at the moment working CCSU mission within the US. Form of tough to view that as “crushing” something. Notably since about 350,000 bbl/d of present US oil manufacturing is from CO2 EOR. Many of the CO2 is from pure reservoirs. If that was transformed to coal fired CCS energy plant sources, the maths could be a bit completely different.

350,000 bbl/d = 2,zero30,000 mmBtu/d19.Three GW @40% = 632,202 mmBtu/d

“If ifs and buts have been sweet and nuts, we’d all get unicorn ponies for Christmas.” Ifs and buts can lower both manner.

Nevertheless, that is the present actuality:

16,000 bbl/d = 92,800 mmBtu/d30 MW @39% = 924 mmBtu/d

Are you able to say “crushing”?

Like this:

Like Loading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *