Fossil Idiot Divestment Achieves New Degree of Actually Silly and Futile Gesturing!

Visitor “Ron White impression” by David Middleton

Revealed on Monday, September 09, 2019 by Frequent Desires

‘Individuals Energy Is Profitable’: Fossil Gas Divestment Motion Celebrates $11 Trillion Milestone
“We’d not have smashed our divestment targets with out the hundreds of native teams who’ve pressured their representatives to tug out of fossil fuels.”

by Jessica Corbett, employees author

Forward of an historic summit in Cape City this week and the worldwide local weather strike deliberate for Sept. 20, the environmental group 350.org introduced Monday that the worldwide motion demanding divestment from fossil fuels and funding in clear power had secured commitments from greater than 1,110 establishments with over $11 trillion in property.

[…]

Frequent Desires

Are these individuals so silly that they really suppose they’ve eradicated $11 trillion price of fossil gasoline property? Even when the entire “1,110 establishments with over $11 trillion in property” truly divested a big quantity of fossil gasoline firms’ inventory, they might solely accomplish that if there have been traders keen to buy that inventory.

Why would they even suppose that “1,110 establishments with over $11 trillion in property” is important? That’s a mean of about $10 billion per establishment. As of August 2018, simply the 2 largest establishments, BlackRock and Vanguard, had $11.four trillion price of property below administration (AUM). The highest 9 funding corporations had $28.34 trillion price of AUM, averaving over $three trillion every. None of those corporations have even expressed an curiosity in becoming a member of the “Fossil-Free” motion. Sure, these idiots are so fracking silly that they name it “fossil-free.”

“We’re divesting as a result of fossil fuels, like coal, oil and gasoline, are poisonous to our planet and everybody who shares this frequent dwelling.” ✊
The #FossilFree motion blasted by means of one other massive milestone this week. Discover out extra: https://t.co/WLYOrxTKW3 #FinancingTheFuture pic.twitter.com/X7ot35N024

— 350 dot org (@350) September 9, 2019

350 dot org and the #FossilFree motion are clearly in Ron White nation.

When you actually can’t repair silly, you’ll be able to edit it out…

The world’s richest establishments spend money on fossil fuels. […Really futile and stupid gesture snipped…].
Divestment is likely one of the fastest-growing actions within the combat in opposition to local weather change. It’s solely getting began.

By Umair Irfan Up to date Could 15, 2019

[…Really futile and stupid gesture snipped…]

There’s nonetheless cash to be made in fossil fuels

[…Really futile and stupid gesture snipped…]

Clearly, there stays a big and rising marketplace for fossil fuels. They continue to be important for the worldwide financial system and a crucial uncooked materials for merchandise like plastics. A lot of the technological progress humanity has made thus far could be traced to low-cost, considerable sources like coal, oil, and pure gasoline. Our present trajectory has us consuming much more.
“The day after, if we had been to divest, we’re nonetheless going to activate the lights,” mentioned Harvard President Lawrence Bacow at a discussion board on fossil gasoline divestment. “We’d nonetheless be depending on fossil fuels.”

However Harvard and comparable establishments have argued that it’s not in regards to the cash. Slightly, they argue that divesting from fossil fuels would politicize their portfolios, they usually have higher methods to combat local weather change.

“The College’s place, because it has said beforehand, is that it shouldn’t use the endowment to attain political ends, or specific coverage ends,” wrote a Harvard spokesman in an e mail. “Harvard is dedicated to influencing public coverage on local weather change by means of scholarship and analysis.”

[…Really futile and stupid gesture snipped…]

Yale College, which sits on a mountain of cash $29.four billion tall, didn’t reply to a request for remark. Nevertheless, David Swensen, the varsity’s chief funding officer, mentioned final yr he doesn’t assist totally divesting from fossil fuels on ethical grounds.

“If we stopped producing fossil fuels immediately we might all die. We wouldn’t have meals. We wouldn’t have transportation. We wouldn’t have warmth. We wouldn’t have air con. We wouldn’t have garments,” he mentioned. “It’s very good to protest the truth that we have now fossil gasoline producers within the portfolio, however the true downside is the consumption, and each one in all us within the room is a shopper. I assume it’s a bit bit more durable to look within the mirror and say ‘I’m a part of the issue’ versus pointing the finger.”

[…Really futile and stupid gesture snipped…]

Divestment isn’t transferring the needle — but — nevertheless it’s altering the dialog
Regardless of beneficial properties in divestment, international greenhouse gasoline emissions proceed to rise. Some fossil gasoline firms are certainly struggling, significantly coal mining corporations. However others are nonetheless making tons of cash. Exxon Mobil generated $279 billion in income in 2018. Shell made $388.four billion. BP made $303.7 billion. Aramco made $355.9 billion.

Analysts agree that the $eight trillion that’s been divested or pledged to withdraw thus far from fossil fuels continues to be a small slice of the general share of the $100 trillion-plus international capital market. “At current, [divestment] has had a fairly minimal influence on the trade,” mentioned Richard Taylor, an oil and gasoline trade analyst at Fitch Options.

[…Really futile and stupid gesture…]

Nonetheless, the general market impacts are minimal as a result of the amount of cash floating round proper now’s so huge and the inertia is immense. “They aren’t altering their conduct, that’s for certain,” mentioned John Thieroff at Moody’s Buyers Service. “Prefer it or not, we’re going to proceed to eat oil and gasoline for whereas. There’s no change that’s going to get flipped within the subsequent yr or two that’s going to allow us to stroll away from oil.”

[…Wailing and teeth gnashing snipped…]

Vox

Actually, the one passages of the Vox article that made any sense in any respect had been these two quotes…

“The day after, if we had been to divest, we’re nonetheless going to activate the lights. We’d nonetheless be depending on fossil fuels.”

Harvard President Lawrence Bacow

“If we stopped producing fossil fuels immediately we might all die. We wouldn’t have meals. We wouldn’t have transportation. We wouldn’t have warmth. We wouldn’t have air con. We wouldn’t have garments,” he mentioned. “It’s very good to protest the truth that we have now fossil gasoline producers within the portfolio, however the true downside is the consumption, and each one in all us within the room is a shopper.”

David Swensen, Yale College chief funding workplace

It’s a fossil fueled world…

Information from BP 2018 Statistical Evaluate of World Power

And fossil gasoline divestment is “a extremely futile and silly gesture”…

Bluto (John Belushi): What the **** occurred to the Greentards I used to know? The place’s the spirit? The place’s the center, huh? This might be the best night time of our lives, however you’re gonna let or not it’s the worst! “Ooh, we’re afraid to go together with you Bluto, we’d get in bother.” Effectively, simply kiss my @$$ any further! Not me! I’m not gonna take this! ExxonMobil, lifeless! Chevron, lifeless! Shell—
Otter (Tim Matheson): Useless! Bluto’s proper. Psychotic, however completely proper. We gotta take these bastards. Now we might do it with standard weapons, however that might take years and price tens of millions of lives. No, I feel we have now to go all out. I feel that this example completely requires a extremely futile and silly gesture be carried out on any individual’s half.
Bluto: And we’re simply the blokes to do it.

Paraphrased from Nationwide Lampoon’s Animal Home (1978)

Like this:

Like Loading…