Information Evaluate by Kip Hansen – 16 February 2020
A number of media items have adopted up on a research in regards to the Thwaites Glacier in Antarctica. Even the (in)well-known climatologist who shares my final identify pulled out this story for the press in Australia. Newsweek ran with it as a part of a disaster article: These 5 Cities Are Susceptible to Rising Seas, Together with Miami and New York. Phys.org carried this: New research fashions affect of calving on retreat of Thwaites Glacier.
What are they saying?
“The Thwaites Glacier is in regards to the dimension of a U.S. swing state and holds sufficient ice to lift sea ranges by about 10 ft. This alone is frightening sufficient to justify its nickname, the Doomsday Glacier, however there’s extra. The Thwaites sits alongside a 75-mile stretch of shoreline in Antarctica that serves to partially defend the huge West Antarctic Ice Sheet from the nice and cozy ocean waters. The WAIS has sufficient ice to lift the seas by 200 ft.”
“These projections carry some uncertainty, however one factor appears fairly clear: the subsequent century shall be robust for coastal metropolis dwellers. Sea ranges are rising about Three millimeters every year. By the tip of the century, the oceans might rise not less than 2 ft over 2005 ranges, in keeping with a 2018 research within the Proceedings of the Nationwide Academies of Science. Michael Mann, a local weather scientist, advised NBC Information that except emissions of greenhouse gases are abated, by the tip of the century greater than 650 million folks shall be residing on land that’s below water all or a lot of the time.”
“We predict that probably in a number of years or a long time, we don’t know but, the rest of the ice shelf in entrance of Thwaites is perhaps gone,” defined Hongju Yu, an assistant specialist on the College of California, Irvine and lead creator of the brand new research.
If the ice shelf disappeared, it might now not present resistance to the glacier’s stream, permitting the glacier to speed up. The glacier would then start dropping mass primarily via rising breakup of chunks of ice at its vanguard—a course of known as calving. The goal of the brand new research was to simulate how a lot Thwaites’ retreat would speed up via calving as soon as the ice shelf disappears.”
If Thwaites collapsed, it might elevate international sea degree by greater than half a meter (practically two ft) and result in a domino impact of additional glacier collapse in West Antarctica. Worst-case situation, it will be gone in lower than a century,” Yu mentioned. “However it could additionally take for much longer.” — Phys.org
That’s plenty of scary speak. What’s all of it about?
The Thwaites Glacier is likely one of the many West Antarctic glaciers.
Thwaites is contained in the Pink Field on the left, in West Antarctica. It isn’t the biggest of the glaciers in Antarctica, however there was long run concern about Thwaites as a result of it’s flowing quicker than many others.
A part of the priority with Thwaites is the “grounding line” – will Thwaites retreat from the grounding line and thus permit the principle glacier to stream quicker into the ocean?
The Thwaites story is a part of the continued controversy over Antarctic ice achieve/loss that has been being fought within the journals for the final 5 or ten years. NASA helps quite a lot of views — 1) NASA Examine: Mass Good points of Antarctic Ice Sheet Higher than Losses ; 2) Antarctica’s contribution to sea degree rise was mitigated by snowfall ; Three) Ramp-up in Antarctic ice loss speeds sea degree rise
The primary research, Zwally (2017), claims Antarctica is gaining mass — not dropping. The second claims that despite the fact that Antarctica is getting extra snow, it isn’t gaining total. And the third claims “Ice losses from Antarctica have tripled since 2012, rising international sea ranges by zero.12 inch (Three millimeters) in that timeframe alone”. The controversy has spawned articles similar to “What to Consider in Antarctica’s Nice Ice Debate”, written by freelance science journalist, which says “In 2015 a research was printed claiming that East Antarctica is in truth gaining mass, opposite to the vast majority of research performed so far” [the study was done in 2015 but published in 2017] however fails to say that the research is from Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Area Flight Heart in Greenbelt, Maryland, which was printed on Oct. 30 2017 within the Journal of Glaciology and which continues to be headlined on the NASA web site. The Scientific American article was rushed into publication four days earlier than the Zwally research appeared within the Journal of Glaciology.
In recent times, the media has usually gone method overboard about Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers. “But when carbon emissions proceed to trace on one thing resembling a worst-case situation, the total 11 ft of ice locked in West Antarctica is perhaps freed up, their research confirmed.” [according to DeConto and Pollard]
The controversy hinges on whether or not the floating ice shelf of Thwaites will regularly retreat and ultimately result in it dropping its buttressing impact on the majority of the glacier. Then if the buttressing is eliminated, will the majority of the glacier then rush into the ocean? Hongju Yu and his workforce don’t suppose so: “…eradicating the ice shelf abruptly doesn’t have a long-lasting affect on the retreat and cumulative mass lack of the glacier.” [study conclusions] – and but Hongju Yu is seemingly quoted on the contrary within the media.
OPINION: Personally, I believe Hongju Yu has been rigorously interviewed into saying issues that the research itself doesn’t help – subtly coerced into statements desired for the narrative of local weather alarm.
readers can plow via the conflicting research for themselves however the backside line is that there’s a “consensus” opinion, backed by many research meant to substantiate what often is the “prevailing bias within the subject” after which there are different research that discover the other or present vastly diminished long-term concern.
What does the featured research actually discover?
The research being spoken of is “Affect of iceberg calving on the retreat of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica over the subsequent century with completely different calving legal guidelines and ocean thermal forcing” [.pdf] by Hongju Yu et al. printed in Geophysical Analysis Letters.
Its printed conclusions are:
“We examine the affect of calving on the evolution of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica over the subsequent century with out its buttressing ice shelf. Our simulations recommend that eradicating the ice shelf abruptly doesn’t have a long-lasting affect on the retreat and cumulative mass lack of the glacier. We calibrate a von Mises calving legislation with Haynes Glacier, which doesn’t have an ice shelf. Throughout the calibrated vary of the calving parameters, we discover a appreciable enhancement of the retreat of the glacier in comparison with the case the place the glacier is just experiencing ice shelf soften. The retreat price varies considerably relying on the choice of σmax. Conversely, we discover buoyancy pushed calving legislation doesn’t affect the retreat by greater than 20% and ice entrance soften by the ocean modulates the retreat by 15% to 50%, with the best improve related to a most thermal forcing of four°C. Primarily based on our experiments, we conclude that Thwaites Glacier will elevate international sea degree by 13-19 mm if the grounding line stabilizes on the western ridge; in any other case, its collapse will proceed and lift international sea degree by 50 mm inside this century.”
What was mentioned within the media:
2 FEET — “By the tip of the century, the oceans might rise not less than 2 ft over 2005 ranges,”
10 FEET — “The Thwaites Glacier is in regards to the dimension of a U.S. swing state and holds sufficient ice to lift sea ranges by about 10 ft.”
200 FEET — “The WAIS has sufficient ice to lift the seas by 200 ft.”
650 MILLION UNDER WATER – “…by the tip of the century greater than 650 million folks shall be residing on land that’s below water” — Michael Mann
ACTUAL MODELLED PREDICTIONS:
13-19 mm = zero.5 to zero.75 inches by 2100
Worst Case — 50 mm = 2 inches
(In fact, each of those situations are “IFs” based mostly on plenty of pc modelling. )
We must wait on Thwaites to see what it will do. We don’t actually perceive the dynamics concerned with Antarctic glaciers but – what makes them velocity up and decelerate. However in any case, even Hongju Yu’s worst case conclusion solely minimally provides to anticipated sea degree rise of about 12 inches ( different opinions differ butn potential values over 2 ft are extraordinarily unlikely) by 2100.
# # # # #
I’ve emailed Professor Hongju Yu and requested him in regards to the obvious disconnect between his research’s conclusions and the statements attributed to him within the media. If he responds, I’ll both add it to Feedback or the principle physique of the essay.
Regardless of repeated assertions of Antarctic ice soften and glacier collapse, the ocean degree report doesn’t present discernible results – international sea ranges nonetheless rising at their centuries lengthy 2-Three mm per 12 months because the Earth local weather warms from the Little Ice Age.
The research of the Antarctic is a legitimate scientific endeavor – however not if its solely function is to try to lift increasingly more alarm about local weather change.
# # # # #