Power Returned on Capital Invested: Ohio “Shale” vs Inexperienced “Schist”

Loading ....

Visitor useful resource economics by David Middleton

Ohio’s shale vitality trade attracts almost $78 billion in funding since 2011

COLUMBUS, OHIO – Complete funding in Ohio’s useful resource wealthy shale vitality sector has reached $78 billion since monitoring started in 2011, in accordance with a Cleveland State College (CSU) research.

Ready for JobsOhio, the report represents the latest information out there and covers shale funding via the second half of 2018. Earlier within the yr, IHS Markit launched estimates that by 2040, the Utica and Marcellus shale area, of which Ohio is a big half, will provide almost half of all U.S. pure gasoline manufacturing.

The research from CSU’s Power Coverage Middle on the Maxine Goodman Levin School of City Affairs, confirmed drilling investments have been barely down within the second half of 2018 in comparison with the primary half, however complete upstream investments have been up. Complete shale-related funding in Ohio for the second half of 2018, together with upstream, midstream and downstream, was round $three.82 billion. Complete funding from 2011-2018 totaled about $77.7 billion.


World Oil

Power Returned on Capital Invested (EROCI)

Are you able to say “hockey sticks”?

And people aren’t the one hockey sticks. Proved reserves of pure gasoline have additionally hockey sticked…

From 2011-2017, Ohio’s proved pure gasoline reserves grew from 758 to 26,123 billion cubic toes (Bcf). EIA’s 2018 reserve report comes out later this month. Nonetheless, the connection between manufacturing and proved reserves from 2011-2017 may be very linear (R² = zero.9555). This means that the 2018 proved reserves can be round 31,000 Bcf.

 Reserves (Bcf) Manufacturing (Bcf)2018                                    31,056                           
2,409 2017                                    26,123                           
1,791 2016                                    15,143                           
1,437 2015                                    12,104                           
1,007 2014                                      6,723                               
512 2013                                      three,161                               
166 2012                                      1,233                                  84 2011                                          758
                                 79 2011-2019 Development                                    30,298  $75,744,713,509  Worth @ $2.50/mcf 

Utilizing a generic value of $2.50 per thousand cubic toes (mcf), or million Btu (mmBtu). The estimated progress in proved reserves from 2011-2018 is value $75.7 billion. That’s simply pure gasoline proved reserves. Proved reserves are the 90% likelihood case. Possible reserves, the most probably case(>50% likelihood), aren’t reported on the State degree; however they’re by definition considerably larger.

What’s that? A $77.7 billion funding in $75.7 billion value of pure gasoline doesn’t sound like a winner? Properly, there’s additionally the worth of the manufacturing, which incorporates some crude oil.

Click on to enlarge.

$75.7B + $30.5B = $106.2B

That’s a 37% return over eight years, a four.6% common annual return.

On prime of that, solely $53.eight billion was upstream (exploration, drilling and manufacturing) funding. This works out to a discovering and improvement (F&D) value of $1.42/mcf. The oil & gasoline costs cited earlier have been wellhead costs (what the producer can anticipate to obtain). From 2011-2018, the wellhead spot value for pure gasoline averaged $three.27/mcf. The remainder of the $77.7 billion went to midstream (pipelines, processing vegetation, and so forth.) and downstream (energy vegetation, petrochemical vegetation and so forth.). Pure gasoline costs escalate from upstream to downstream (a value-added course of). So, the overall worth of the $77.7 billion funding is far bigger than simply the worth of the oil & pure gasoline.

Ohio’s Shale Economic system: What the Analysis Says

“All in”, $77.7 billion works out to $2.06/mcf (million Btu).

Relating to Inexperienced “Schist”

New clear vitality funding in growing nations slipped sharply final yr: report
Nina Chestney

LONDON (Reuters) – New clear vitality funding slid by greater than a fifth in growing nations final yr because of a slowdown in China, whereas the quantity of coal-fired energy technology jumped to a brand new excessive, an annual survey confirmed on Monday.

Bloomberg New Power Finance (BNEF) surveyed 104 rising markets and located that growing nations have been shifting in direction of cleaner energy sources, however not quick sufficient to restrict carbon dioxide emissions or the results of local weather change.

New funding in wind, photo voltaic and different clear vitality initiatives dropped to $133 billion final yr from $169 billion a yr earlier, primarily because of a stoop in Chinese language funding, the analysis confirmed.

China’s clear vitality funding fell to $86 billion from $122 billion a yr earlier. Funding by India and Brazil additionally declined, primarily because of decrease prices for photo voltaic and wind.

Nonetheless, the quantity of coal-fired energy technology produced and consumed in growing nations elevated to a brand new excessive of 6,900 terrawatt hours (TWh) final yr, from 6,400 TWh in 2017.

The rise of 500 TWh is equal to the ability consumed within the U.S. state of Texas in a single yr. Coal accounted for 47% of all energy technology throughout the 104 nations.



In keeping with BP’s 2019 Statistical Assessment of World Power, the “world” generated 15.9 billion mmBtu (transformed from TWh) of vitality from renewable sources from 2017-2018. This works out to $19.05/mmBtu, about 10 instances the price of pure gasoline.

mmBtuInvested ($)$/mmBtu2018       eight,463,089,501  $       133,000,000,000  $  15.72 2017       7,392,040,238  $       169,000,000,000  $  22.86 2017-2018     15,855,129,739  $       302,000,000,000  $  19.05

Some might take subject with this comparability, as a result of it doesn’t account for the warmth loss in producing electrical energy from pure gasoline. The typical mixed cycle pure gasoline energy plant generated 1 kWh per 7,627 Btu. A 100% environment friendly energy plant would solely require three,412 Btu to generate 1 kWh.

Whereas it’s true that a few of the vitality is misplaced within the strategy of producing electrical energy and heating our properties, superior mixed cycle pure gasoline energy vegetation can obtain >60% effectivity in changing warmth into electrical energy, the 2018 common was about 45%. Fashionable pure gasoline furnaces can obtain 90-97% effectivity.

Power Returned on Capital Invested$/mmBtuOhio “Shale” 2011-2018 $       2.06 Ohio “Shale” @60% effectivity $       three.43 Ohio “Shale” @45% effectivity $       four.58 World Renewables 2017-2018 $    19.05

And, not like renewables, pure gasoline can exchange coal on a megawatt for megawatt foundation. So, if saving the planet from carbon dioxide was the actual goal, the greenie weenies can be all on-board the pure gasoline bandwagon.


bbl = barrel, barrels. Every barrel consists of 42 US gallons. 1 bbl of crude oil incorporates roughly 5.eight million Btu of vitality.

Bcf = 1 billion normal cubic toes (scf) of pure gasoline.

Btu = British thermal unit.

mbbl = 1,000 barrels.

mcf = 1,000 normal cubic toes (scf) of pure gasoline, usually equal to 1 million Btu. Technically it’s normally extra like 1,020,000 Btu; however mcf and mmBtu are normally handled as being interchangeable. Pure gasoline costs are usually listed as $/mcf or $/mmBtu.

mmBtu = 1,000,000 Btu.

mmcf = 1,000,000 normal cubic toes (scf) of pure gasoline.

scf = Commonplace cubic foot (toes) of pure gasoline, measured at 60 °F at sea degree (14.7 psi). Typically equal to 1,020 Btu.

Shale = “Shale is laminated, indurated (consolidated) rock with > 67% clay-sized supplies.” Jackson, J.A. (1997). Glossary of Geology, 4th Ed., American Geological Institute. Most “shale” performs aren’t technically shale.

Schist = 1) A foliated metamorphic rock, usually ensuing from the deformation of shale and different forms of mudstone. 2) A scatological euphemism, as in “inexperienced schist.” As knowledgeable geologist, I make intensive use of geological euphemisms… And I don’t care when you assume it’s infantile.

Knowledge Sources

Ohio Pure Fuel Marketed Manufacturing

Ohio Discipline Manufacturing of Crude Oil

Ohio Pure Fuel Proved Reserves

Cushing, OK WTI Spot Value FOB ( per Barrel)

Henry Hub Pure Fuel Spot Value ( per Million Btu)

BP Statistical Assessment of World Power

Like this:

Like Loading…




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *